There are a few different approaches developers used to prepopulate the “Regarding” and “Activity Party” fields of activities: The “Microsoft” way – the way the Classic UI worked to prepopulate fields – usage of undocumented parameters passed through the url and different variations around it. From Microsoft’s perspective this approach is unsupported. I’ve published 2…
Continue Reading Andrew Butenko’s Article on their blog
Populate Regarding and Activity Party Fields in the UCI Interface
There are a few different approaches developers used to prepopulate the “Regarding” and “Activity Party” fields of activities: The “Microsoft” way – the way the Classic UI worked to prepopulate fields – usage of undocumented parameters passed through the url and different variations around it. From Microsoft’s perspective this approach is unsupported.
Blog Syndicated with Andrew Butenko’s Permission
More About This Author
Array
Dyn365CE1 April 2024Canvas Apps: Watch PCF Component
Dyn365CE6 November 2023Dataverse “When an action is performed” trigger doesn’t fire – what to do
Dyn365CE10 October 2023Synchronizing aggregation fields and subgrids data in MDA forms
Dyn365CE28 September 2023Validating current user privileges on the client side
