How to Set Up Data Loss Prevention (DLP) in Microsoft 365

Are you actually protecting your company’s data, or just ticking a compliance box? Most admins set up a few blanket DLP rules and assume they’re covered. But if sensitive files are still slipping through Teams chats or emails, that’s a massive blind spot. In this podcast, I’ll show you how to build a layered DLP strategy inside Microsoft 365—step by step, like assembling a real security system. By the end, you’ll know if your setup is just policy paperwork, or an actual fortress. Let’s find out which one you’ve got.The Hidden Map of Your Sensitive DataEvery company thinks they have a clear handle on where their files live. Ask three different admins and you’ll almost always hear three different answers. Some swear everything important is locked down in SharePoint. Others claim OneDrive is where the bulk of corporate files sit. Then there’s always someone who insists Teams has become the new filing system. The truth is, they’re all correct—and that mix is exactly where the challenge begins. Data in Microsoft 365 is everywhere, and once you start poking around, you realize just how scattered it really is. That scattering, or “data sprawl,” sneaks in quietly. A finance manager stores quarterly forecasts in OneDrive to finish at home. HR officers send performance reviews as attachments inside Teams chats. Sales reps drop entire customer lists into email threads so they can ask quick questions. None of this feels risky at the time—it’s just how people get their work done. But from an admin’s perspective, it’s chaos. Sensitive data ends up scattered across services that weren’t designed as the final resting place for long‑term confidential files. Here’s where the headache begins. You’ve been told to build DLP policies, but you sit down, look at the console, and realize you don’t even know which workloads hold the dangerous stuff. If you target too broadly, you risk endless false positives and frustrated users. If you target too narrowly, you blind yourself to leaks happening in less obvious places. That’s the tension—how do you lock down what you can’t even find? Picture this: one of your project managers, excited to share progress, posts a confidential report into a Teams channel with external guests. The file syncs to people’s laptops before you even wake up in the morning. No one involved meant harm. They just didn’t realize an internal-only file was suddenly accessible to outsiders. That tiny slip could turn into regulatory fines or even a reputational hit if the wrong set of eyes lands on the document. And the worst part? Without visibility tools in place, you might not even know it happened. SharePoint brings its own subtle traps. You might believe a library is safely restricted to “internal only,” but the second sync client is enabled, those files flow down to end‑user laptops. Suddenly you have copies of sensitive material sitting unencrypted in places you can’t directly monitor. A misplaced laptop or a personal backup tool picking up synced data means confidential material leaks outside your intended perimeter. None of that shows up if you’re only staring at basic access controls. This is why discovery matters. Microsoft includes tools like Content Explorer and Activity Explorer for exactly this reason. With Content Explorer, you can drill into where certain sensitive information types—like financial IDs or personal identifiers—are actually stored. It’s not guesswork; you can see raw numbers and counts, broken down across SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange. Activity Explorer builds on that by highlighting how those sensitive items are being used—whether they’re shared internally, uploaded, or sent to external contacts. When you first open these dashboards, it can be sobering. Files you thought were locked away neatly often show up in chat threads, temp folders, or forgotten OneDrive accounts. By building this map, you trade uncertainty for clarity. Instead of saying “we think payroll data might be in SharePoint somewhere,” you know exactly which sites and which accounts hold payroll files, and you can watch how they’re accessed day to day. That understanding transforms how you design protection strategies. Without it, your rules are guesses—sometimes lucky ones, sometimes costly misses. With it, you’re working from evidence. What discovery really does is shift invisible risks into visible assets. Once something is visible, you can measure it, plan around it, and ultimately protect it. That’s a huge change in approach for admins. You stop standing in reaction mode—responding only after a problem surfaces—and start proactively shaping your defensive posture based on actual data flows. So before we talk about setting any rules or policies, the first foundation stone is this discovery step. Think of it like surveying the land before building anything. If you don’t know what sits beneath the soil—rocks, wires, pipes—you set yourself up for future failures. The same principle applies to DLP. If you skip this stage, everything else sits on shaky ground. But once you’ve built a clear hidden map of your sensitive information, you can stop guessing and finally work with precision. And with that clarity, the next challenge emerges. It’s not just about knowing where the information lives. The real question becomes: which parts of it are actually worth treating as sensitive? That’s where classification comes in.Drawing Boundaries: Classifying What Really MattersNot every document is worth locking down, but how do you draw the line without suffocating productivity? It’s tempting to treat everything as sensitive because it feels safer. But the side effect of that approach is usually chaos. If every file is protected with the same heavy set of restrictions, users stop trusting the system. They’ll find workarounds or worse, ignore the rules outright. That’s not security—it’s friction disguised as control. The real challenge is making sure the right data gets secure treatment without slowing down the entire organization. The problem shows up most clearly in what’s called over-classification. This is when you label nearly every single file as sensitive, regardless of what’s inside. Sounds protective, right? But in real-world usage, it leads to exactly the opposite. When all documents get treated like crown jewels, the actual sensitive files blend in with noise. From an admin’s perspective, it becomes impossible to tell which policy alerts actually matter. From a user’s perspective, all they see is that they can’t email, share, or save anything without running headfirst into warnings or outright blocks. The collision really takes off when you look at the pressure from both sides. Executives are focused on reducing risk. Their natural instinct is to push for tighter rules everywhere. They want to hear that every contract, every spreadsheet, and every email is fully shielded. Employees, on the other hand, aren’t measured on compliance—they’re measured on output. And anytime strict restrictions slow down day-to-day work, people start getting creative. That usually means finding ways around IT controls, like uploading red‑lined docs to consumer storage services or sidestepping Teams by using personal email. Both sides have valid needs, but this tug-of-war makes classification one of the trickiest stages in rolling out DLP. One story stands out here. An IT team once set blanket restrictions across all files, thinking it would stop leaks before they ever began. The policy was so broad that employees couldn’t even email out simple training guides—things meant for new hires that carried zero risk. Trainers kept running into blocked messages, course materials wouldn’t send, and staff had to beg IT for exceptions. The backlash was immediate. IT went from heroes protecting data to roadblocks holding everyone up. Within weeks, the rules had to be rolled back. That situation could have been avoided entirely if classification was handled with nuance instead of a blanket stamp. This is where Microsoft 365 offers admins a starting compass. Sensitive information types are built into the system—identifiers for things like credit card details, Social Security numbers, or health-related records. These patterns give you a foundation to begin separating what matters most from everything else. Instead of saying “protect everything,” you start with clear categories of data that obviously demand higher protection. That way, your policies have a grounded focus. They aren’t theoretical—they’re pointing at actual markers buried inside the data flowing through email, Teams, and SharePoint. But industries don’t all look the same. A consulting firm cares about contract language that defines liability clauses. A biotech company sees raw research data as the lifeblood of its competitive advantage. Microsoft’s custom sensitive information types let you flag those exact items that the defaults can’t see. You can train the system to recognize recurring patterns or keywords specific to your field. That way, classification expands far beyond a basic template into something shaped directly to your organization’s real risks. Now, even once you’ve defined sensitive information types, you still face the question of labeling. Users can tag documents themselves—manual labeling—or you can use auto-labeling policies that apply tags based on detected patterns. Manual labeling gives control to the people creating content, but it assumes they understand classification guidelines and apply them correctly every time. Auto-labeling reduces that human error by handling detection in the background. The tradeoff is that automated rules might occasionally misfire. For many organizations, the best answer is a combination: auto-labeling for high-risk types, with manual labels in place where human judgment really adds value. When classification is executed well, it doesn’t overwhelm employees—it actually disappears into the background. The system knows which files truly matter

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-fm-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365–6704921/support.