Why Your Data Model Will Drift

Episode OverviewThis episode explores how organizations approach data governance, why many initiatives stall, and what practical, human-centered governance can look like in reality. Rather than framing governance as a purely technical or compliance-driven exercise, the conversation emphasizes trust, clarity, accountability, and organizational design. The discussion draws from real-world experience helping organizations move from ad-hoc data practices toward sustainable, value-driven governance models.Key Themes & Takeaways1. Why Most Organizations Struggle with Data Governance

• Many organizations begin their data governance journey reactively—often due to regulatory pressure, data incidents, or leadership mandates.
• Governance is frequently introduced as a top-down control mechanism, which leads to resistance, workarounds, and superficial compliance.
• A common failure mode is over-indexing on tools, frameworks, or committees before clarifying purpose and ownership.
• Without clear incentives, governance becomes “extra work” rather than part of how people already operate.

2. Governance Is an Organizational Problem, Not a Tooling Problem

• Tools can support governance, but they cannot create accountability or shared understanding.
• Successful governance starts with clearly defined decision rights: who owns data, who can change it, and who is accountable for outcomes.
• Organizations often confuse data governance with data management, metadata, or documentation—these are enablers, not governance itself.
• Governance must align with how the organization already makes decisions, not fight against it.

3. The Role of Trust and Culture

• Governance works best in high-trust environments where people feel safe raising issues and asking questions about data quality and usage.
• Low-trust cultures tend to produce heavy-handed rules that slow teams down without improving outcomes.
• Psychological safety is critical: people must feel comfortable admitting uncertainty or mistakes in data.
• Transparency about how data is used builds confidence and reduces fear-driven behavior.

4. Start with Business Value, Not Policy

• Effective governance begins by identifying high-value data products and critical business decisions.
• Policies should emerge from real use cases, not abstract ideals.
• Focusing on a small number of high-impact datasets creates momentum and credibility.
• Governance tied to outcomes (revenue, risk reduction, customer experience) gains executive support faster.

5. Ownership and Accountability

• Clear data ownership is non-negotiable, but ownership does not mean sole control.
• Data owners are responsible for quality, definitions, and access decisions—not for doing all the work themselves.
• Stewardship roles help distribute responsibility while keeping accountability clear.
• Governance fails when ownership is assigned in name only, without time, authority, or support.

6. Federated vs. Centralized Governance Models

• Purely centralized governance does not scale in complex organizations.
• Purely decentralized models often result in inconsistency and duplication.
• Federated models balance local autonomy with shared standards and principles.
• Central teams should act as enablers and coaches, not gatekeepers.

7. Metrics That Actually Matter

• Measuring governance success by the number of policies or meetings is misleading.
• Better metrics include:
  • Time to find and understand data
  • Data quality issues detected earlier
  • Reduced rework and duplication
  • Confidence in decision-making
• Qualitative feedback from data users is often as important as quantitative metrics.

8. Governance as a Continuous Practice

• Governance is not a one-time project—it evolves as the organization and its data mature.
• Policies and standards should be revisited regularly based on real usage.
• Lightweight governance that adapts over time outperforms rigid, comprehensive frameworks.
• Iteration and learning are signs of healthy governance, not failure.

Practical Advice Shared in the Episode

• Start small: pick one domain, one dataset, or one decision and govern that well.
• Use existing forums and workflows instead of creating new committees whenever possible.
• Write policies in plain language that people can actually understand and follow.
• Treat governance conversations as design sessions, not enforcement actions.
• Invest in education so teams understand not just the rules, but the reasons behind them.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Treating governance as a documentation exercise
• Rolling out enterprise-wide rules before testing them locally
• Assigning ownership without authority or incentives
• Confusing compliance with effectiveness
• Expecting tools to solve human and organizational problems

Who This Episode Is For

• Data leaders struggling to gain traction with governance initiatives
• Executives looking for practical, non-bureaucratic approaches to data accountability
• Data practitioners frustrated by unclear ownership and inconsistent standards
• Organizations transitioning from ad-hoc analytics to data-driven decision-making

Closing ThoughtsThe episode reinforces that good data governance is less about control and more about clarity. When organizations focus on trust, ownership, and real business outcomes, governance becomes an enabler rather than a blocker. Sustainable governance grows out of everyday work, not slide decks or rulebooks.These show notes were developed from the full episode transcript and are intended to capture both the explicit discussion and the underlying principles shared throughout the conversation.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365–6704921/support.